EISSN 2148-3817

SCOPUS CITESCORE: 1.8 IMPACT FACTOR: 1.0 JIAO IS INDEXED IN WEB OF SCIENCE AND PUBMED

The Journal of International
Advanced Otology

20 127 2024

HIGHLY CITED ARTICLES

Comparison of the Surgical Techniques and Robotic Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in Terms of the Trajectories Toward the Inner Ear

By: Topsakal et al.

The Effectiveness of Medical Prophylactic Treatment on Vestibular Migraine and Its Effect on the Quality Of Life

By: Çelik et al.

Comparison of Electrocochleography and Video Head Impulse Test findings in Vestibular Migraine and Meniere Disease: A Preliminary Study

By: Martines et al.

Selective Asymmetry of Ocular Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential in Patients with Acute Utricular Macula Loss

By: Manzari et al.

A Novel Bone Conduction Hearing System May Improve Memory Function in Children with Single Side Hearing loss: A Case-Control Study

By: Di Stadio et al.

Cone-Beam CT Compared to Multi-Slice CT for the Diagnostic Analysis of Conductive Hearing Loss: A Feasibility Study

By: Kemp et al.

Malignant Otitis Externa: Causes for Various Treatment Responses

By: Arsovic et al.

Effects of the Conductive Component of Hearing Loss on Speech Discrimination Ability

By: Kurioka et al.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Post Synaptic Auditory Neuropathies: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

By: Chaudhry et al.

New Classification of Cochlear Hypoplasia Type Malformation: Relevance in Cochlear Implantation

By: Halawani and Dhanasinghi.

Original Article

Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy

Paul Van de Heyning ¹ , Javier Gavilán ² , Benoît Godey ³ , Rudolf Hagen ⁴ , Abdulrahman Hagr ⁵ , Mohan Kameswaran ⁶ , Yongxin Li ⁷ , Manikoth Manoj ⁸ , Robert Mlynski ⁹ , Martin O’Driscoll ¹⁰ , Harold Pillsbury ¹¹ , Christopher H. Raine ¹² , Gunesh Rajan ¹³ , Joachim Schmutzhard ¹⁴ , Hinrich Staecker ¹⁵

Author Affiliation(s)

1.

Department of ENT, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp Belgium

2.

Madrid Hospital La Paz Paseo de la Castellana, Madrid, Spain

3.

CHU - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France

4.

Würzburg ENT University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany

5.

King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, ENT Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

6.

Madras ENT Research Foundation, Tamil Nadu, India

7.

Capital Medical University, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Shi, China

8.

Calicut ENT Super Speciality Institute and Research Center, Kerala, India

9.

Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany

10.

Central Manchester University Hospitals Ellen Wilkinson Building, Manchester, United Kingdom

11.

UNC Ear & Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA

12.

Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Center, Bradford, United Kingdom

13.

Luzern HNO-klinik Kantonspital Luzerner, Luzern, Switzerland

14.

Department of ENT, University Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

15.

Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, USA

J Int Adv Otol 2022; 18: 196-202

DOI: 10.5152/iao.2022.21470

Keywords : Cochlear implants, candidacy criteria, adults, children, guidelines

Read: 1421 Downloads: 709 Published: 01 May 2022

Volume 18, Issue 3, May 2022

Previous Article

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find out how candidacy criteria have evolved differently across the globe.

METHODS: Candidacy criteria and outcome measurements applied in 19 HEARRING clinics were analyzed.

RESULTS: Candidacy criteria vary between clinics. Overall, both bilateral implantation and cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness are becoming more frequent.

CONCLUSION: Standardized outcome measurement instruments need to be applied to provide access to the hearing world to all patients with hearing loss who would benefit from cochlear implantation.

Cite this article as: Van de Heyning P, Gavilán J, Godey B, et al. Worldwide variation in cochlear implant candidacy. J Int Adv Otol. 2022;18(3):196-202.

Files